From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751375AbdAQSb3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:31:29 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:34408 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbdAQSb0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:31:26 -0500 From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz Reply-To: arekm@maven.pl To: Dave Carroll Subject: Re: aacraid: kernel: AAC: Host adapter dead -1 (bisected) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:31:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.9.4; KDE/4.14.27; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Raghava Aditya Renukunta , "Johannes Thumshirn" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "dl-esc-Aacraid Linux Driver" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" References: <201701151205.37563.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> <423FD6710FB8FB4F8728F93591889F9A4143D2BB@avsrvexchmbx2.microsemi.net> In-Reply-To: <423FD6710FB8FB4F8728F93591889F9A4143D2BB@avsrvexchmbx2.microsemi.net> Organization: Do not reply to gmail address. Write to arekm@maven.pl instead. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <201701171931.23227.a.miskiewicz@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v0HIVdG6026846 On Tuesday 17 of January 2017, Dave Carroll wrote: > > Hi. > > > > There is a bug with handling of adaptec raid cards (in my case it is > > Adaptec 3405) where kernel logs hundreds of "AAC: Host adapter dead -1" > > messages. > > > > Bug was reported previously on lkml but there was no progres in solving > > it. > > > > There is also bugzilla entry: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151661 > > > > I've bisected that to commit bellow and indeed, reverting it from kernel > > 4.9.3 makes messages go away. > > > > Could anyone at microsemi look at this regression? > > > > Thanks > > Hi Arkadiusz, > > Thanks for your effort in determining the cause of the issue. It makes > sense now that the patch should have been included in controller specific > code, rather than common code. > > I will prepare a patch for this, and if you are willing to test it, that > would be great! Great! I have dedicated machine for testing this, so yes - I'll test. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz, arekm / ( maven.pl | pld-linux.org )