From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751600AbdAQXcf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:32:35 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:58308 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751579AbdAQXbk (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:31:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:25:37 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Vignesh R Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Peter Hurley , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tty: serial: 8250_omap: Enable DMA support Message-ID: <20170117232536.GZ7403@atomide.com> References: <20170113080201.6515-1-vigneshr@ti.com> <20170113182021.GD2630@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Vignesh R [170117 02:06]: > > > On Tuesday 17 January 2017 11:36 AM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > > > > On Friday 13 January 2017 11:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> * Vignesh R [170113 00:03]: > >>> This patch series re enables DMA support for UART 8250_omap driver. > >>> > >>> Tested on AM335x, AM437x that use EDMA and OMAP5 and DRA74 EVM with > >>> SDMA. > >> > >> Is 8250_omap serial console working for you on omap5 in general? > >> > >> I've noticed that it's really unresponsive for me as if the FIFO > >> interrupt was not working. For example logging in might take several > >> attempts and a long time with each character showing up much later > >> after some timeout. > >> > > > > Yes, I did face the same issue on omap5 using 8250_omap driver for > > console. Looks like this bug has existed all along. > > > > This looks a separate issue, I don't see any errata specific errata wrt > UART on OMAP5. I will try to debug further. OK maybe it's something configured or not configured by the bootloader that we're missing in the Linux driver? Other than the omap5 issue, 8250_OMAP seems to behave on all variants that I've tried it with so far. Regards, Tony