From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752673AbdASNp3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:45:29 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33627 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751902AbdASNp1 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:45:27 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:21:47 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 033/120] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix hardcoded socket
 0 assumption in the Haswell init code
Message-ID: <20170119132147.GA19048@gmail.com>
References: <20170118104648.120216880@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20170118104649.461809044@linuxfoundation.org>
 <587F7DCF.70800@redhat.com>
 <20170118163350.GA10804@kroah.com>
 <587F9E1E.4010903@redhat.com>
 <20170118222526.GB24486@gmail.com>
 <588095CE.4010601@redhat.com>
 <20170119114925.GA19236@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170119114925.GA19236@kroah.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 05:32:46AM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 01/18/2017 05:25 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > * Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> 4.9 is broken and requires additional patches beyond this patch.  Applying this 
> > >> patch to 4.9 stable without those additional fixes will result in kernel panics 
> > >> on some Haswell systems that boot on random cores.
> > > 
> > > Could you list the patches that are required? It would be nice to backport all 
> > > required fixes to v4.9.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah, I'm going to do that once I get the system back.  I have a feeling that
> > just the two additional patches are required but I want to make sure before I
> > post anything.
> 
> So what do I do here?  Drop this single patch?  Add others now?  Ignore
> it and leave it as-is?
> 
> still confused,

Please drop the patch for now - we'll sort it all out and will send you a list of 
commit IDs to backport once everything's clear!

Thanks,

	Ingo