From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 10:24:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170121092459.GA29138@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1701202331420.11070@casper.infradead.org>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:11PM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> > > > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers
> > > > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros.
> > > > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable
> > > > > for the upstream client.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_fid.h | 353 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_ostid.h | 233 ++++++++++++++
> > > >
> > > > Can you make a lustre "uapi" directory so we can see which files you
> > > > really want to be UAPI and which you don't as time goes on?
> > >
> > > Where do you want them placed? In uapi/linux/lustre or uapi/lustre. Does
> > > it matter to you? The below was to forth coming UAPI headers which from
> > > your response you seem okay with in general.
> >
> > How many .h files are there going to be? It's just a single filesystem,
> > shouldn't you just need a single file? If so, how about
> > drivers/staging/lustre/include/uapi/lustre.h
> > ?
> >
> > If you really need multiple .h files, put them all in the same uapi/
> > directory with a lustre_ prefix, you don't need a whole subdir just for
> > yourself, right?
>
> We have 12 UAPI headers and yes they all begin with lustre_*. Okay I will
> create a driver/staging/lustre/include/uapi/linux directory and start
> moving headers there.
12 seems like a lot just for a single, tiny, filesystem :)
But moving them all to a single directory will see where we can later
merge them together, sounds like a good plan.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-21 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-19 17:06 [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers James Simmons
2017-01-03 14:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-16 21:28 ` James Simmons
2017-01-17 7:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-20 23:33 ` James Simmons
2017-01-21 9:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-01-30 0:09 ` James Simmons
2017-06-12 20:20 ` Dilger, Andreas
2017-06-12 20:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2017-06-13 4:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-06-15 15:48 ` [lustre-devel] " James Simmons
2017-06-15 16:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170121092459.GA29138@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox