From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751235AbdAVLYo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 22 Jan 2017 06:24:44 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50744 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750770AbdAVLYk (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 22 Jan 2017 06:24:40 -0500
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:24:50 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: use chacha20 for get_random_int/long
Message-ID: <20170122112450.GD18923@kroah.com>
References: <20170106183202.5035-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20170118034907.spozwf4erlvx5s4x@thunk.org>
 <CAHmME9qRHdTQj_wmLV1tBv1SdO+xy1HhYtTJohs6V1sFZZZeyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170120142852.lznr25go4pbdlwdt@thunk.org>
 <CAHmME9pbSRXuuFgXzLvKS=faJ0_7TOHCZGZg49=0+Yc=cO6-6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170121001509.fj23eunnkaqj7yce@thunk.org>
 <CAHmME9p3xc6Q2Qu6kEP1O3PmvLKhpWcwjHfX8AQyibC0Quh65g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170121062432.kf7xnu56g7vvh4ky@thunk.org>
 <CAHmME9qrnED9c1pZTfCx3_idhZqvvnpHWJyFG7OmRZdLc0h7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9qrnED9c1pZTfCx3_idhZqvvnpHWJyFG7OmRZdLc0h7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Ted,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > Oh, I see.
> >
> > So that's not how I would do things, but it's fine.
> 
> 
> Great, alright. In what tree should I look for these two commits? Or
> should I send it to the drivers/char maintainer (now CCd)?

No objection from me, but as the core stuff is in the networking tree,
maybe it makes more sense for them to flow through there?

Ted, any objection to that?

thanks,

greg k-h