From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751554AbdAVPUB (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:20:01 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54840 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750925AbdAVPTy (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 10:19:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 16:20:04 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , LKML , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: use chacha20 for get_random_int/long Message-ID: <20170122152004.GA21640@kroah.com> References: <20170118034907.spozwf4erlvx5s4x@thunk.org> <20170120142852.lznr25go4pbdlwdt@thunk.org> <20170121001509.fj23eunnkaqj7yce@thunk.org> <20170121062432.kf7xnu56g7vvh4ky@thunk.org> <20170122112450.GD18923@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 01:21:39PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Greg, > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:08:12PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > >> Hi Ted, > >> > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > >> > Oh, I see. > >> > > >> > So that's not how I would do things, but it's fine. > >> > >> > >> Great, alright. In what tree should I look for these two commits? Or > >> should I send it to the drivers/char maintainer (now CCd)? > > > > No objection from me, but as the core stuff is in the networking tree, > > maybe it makes more sense for them to flow through there? > > The core stuff is not in the networking tree. This is nothing to do > with the networking tree in any way at all. There might be some > confusion because the initial discussions came from the siphash stuff, > which is in the networking tree, but Ted and I choose a different > route, going with chacha instead of siphash. So this is 0% > network-related. Sorry, you are correct, I am confused here. > > Ted, any objection to that? > > Seems like either you pull or Ted pulls it. Can you repost these? They are gone from my patch queue. Ted, any objection for me to take these? thanks, greg k-h