From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750737AbdAVW2v (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:28:51 -0500 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:41952 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750703AbdAVW2v (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:28:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:28:42 -0500 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , LKML , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: use chacha20 for get_random_int/long Message-ID: <20170122222842.zi2ldbeansjarhtr@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , LKML , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Andy Lutomirski References: <20170120142852.lznr25go4pbdlwdt@thunk.org> <20170121001509.fj23eunnkaqj7yce@thunk.org> <20170121062432.kf7xnu56g7vvh4ky@thunk.org> <20170122112450.GD18923@kroah.com> <20170122152004.GA21640@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170122152004.GA21640@kroah.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > The core stuff is not in the networking tree. This is nothing to do > > with the networking tree in any way at all. There might be some > > confusion because the initial discussions came from the siphash stuff, > > which is in the networking tree, but Ted and I choose a different > > route, going with chacha instead of siphash. So this is 0% > > network-related. > > Sorry, you are correct, I am confused here. > > > > Ted, any objection to that? > > > > Seems like either you pull or Ted pulls it. > > Can you repost these? They are gone from my patch queue. > > Ted, any objection for me to take these? If there are other changes to the relevant lines from the networking tree, sure. Otherwise, I was planning on taking them, since I've got some other changes to drivers/char/random.c I was planning on sending through the next merge window anyway. I don't think there will be any merge difficulties, but it's simpler if all of the changes to a particular file is going through one tree. But if you really want to take it, I'm not going to object any more than expressing a preference to do it the other way. Cheers, - Ted