From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751271AbdAYEwF (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:52:05 -0500 Received: from LGEAMRELO13.lge.com ([156.147.23.53]:57348 "EHLO lgeamrelo13.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbdAYEwD (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:52:03 -0500 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.127 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 165.244.249.26 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.223.161 X-Original-MAILFROM: minchan@kernel.org Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:51:37 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Sergey Senozhatsky CC: Matthew Wilcox , zhouxianrong , Joonsoo Kim , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: extend zero pages to same element pages for zram Message-ID: <20170125045137.GA18289@bbox> References: <20170123025826.GA24581@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20170123040347.GA2327@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170123062716.GF24581@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE> <20170123071339.GD2327@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170123074054.GA12782@bbox> <1ac33960-b523-1c58-b2de-8f6ddb3a5219@huawei.com> <20170125012905.GA17937@bbox> <20170125013244.GB2234@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170125024835.GA24387@bombadil.infradead.org> <20170125041857.GC2234@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170125041857.GC2234@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on LGEKRMHUB06/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/01/25 13:51:42, Serialize by Router on LGEKRMHUB06/LGE/LG Group(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017/01/25 13:51:43, Serialize complete at 2017/01/25 13:51:43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:18:58PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (01/24/17 18:48), Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:32:44AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On (01/25/17 10:29), Minchan Kim wrote: > > > [..] > > > > > the result as listed below: > > > > > > > > > > zero pattern_char pattern_short pattern_int pattern_long total (unit) > > > > > 162989 14454 3534 23516 2769 3294399 (page) > > > > > > > > > > > > > so, int covers 93%. As considering non-zero dedup hit ratio is low, I think *int* is > > > > enough if memset is really fast. So, I'd like to go with 'int' if Sergey doesn't mind. > > > > > > yep, 4 byte pattern matching and memset() sounds like a good plan to me > > > > what? memset ONLY HANDLES BYTES. > > > > I pointed this out earlier, but you don't seem to be listening. Let me > > try it again. > > > > MEMSET ONLY HANDLES BYTES. > > dammit... how did that happen... > > > Matthew, you are absolute right. and, yes, I missed out your previous > mail, indeed. sorry. and thanks for "re-pointing" that out. > > > Minchan, zhouxianrong, I was completely wrong. we can't > do memset(). d'oh, I did not know it truncates 4 bytes to > one byte only (doesn't make too much sense to me). Now, I read Matthew's comment and understood. Thanks. It means zhouxianrong's patch I sent recently is okay? Thanks.