From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751838AbdAYJrJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:47:09 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53350 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751679AbdAYJrH (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:47:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:46:53 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 9/9] perf/amd/iommu: Enable support for multiple IOMMUs Message-ID: <20170125094653.GO6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1484551416-5440-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <1484551416-5440-10-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1484551416-5440-10-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:23:36AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > + pi = container_of(event->pmu, struct perf_amd_iommu, pmu); > + hwc->idx = pi->idx; > + hwc->config = event->attr.config; > + hwc->extra_reg.config = event->attr.config1; > static void perf_iommu_enable_event(struct perf_event *ev) > { > + struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &ev->hw; > u8 csource = _GET_CSOURCE(ev); > u16 devid = _GET_DEVID(ev); > u8 bank = _GET_BANK(ev); > @@ -253,30 +248,34 @@ static void perf_iommu_enable_event(struct perf_event *ev) > u64 reg = 0ULL; > > reg = csource; > - amd_iommu_pc_set_reg(0, bank, cntr, > + amd_iommu_pc_set_reg(hwc->idx, bank, cntr, > IOMMU_PC_COUNTER_SRC_REG, ®); Please explain about this IOMMU crud, this looks like fail. hwc->idx should be the counter, not a random pmu index. But instead it looks like you get the counter form: #define _GET_CNTR(ev) ((u8)(ev->hw.extra_reg.reg)) Which is absolutely insane.