From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753659AbdAZKJ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:09:58 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46996 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752969AbdAZKJz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2017 05:09:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:10:07 +0100 From: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" To: Dexuan Cui Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , KY Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "olaf@aepfle.de" , Rolf Neugebauer , "jasowang@redhat.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "apw@canonical.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: finally fix hv_need_to_signal_on_read() Message-ID: <20170126101007.GA4936@kroah.com> References: <20170124080818.48c26a6c@xeon-e3> <20170126071653.GA26979@kroah.com> <20170126074917.GA21753@kroah.com> <20170126091650.GA31667@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:31:32AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: > > From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > > > From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > > > > > > > It's interesting v4.4.44 is not impacted, but actually it needs both the 2 > > > > patches: > > > > > > > i.e. this patch, and the previous one: > > > > > > > Commit a389fcfd2cb5 ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Fix signaling logic in > > > > > > hv_need_to_signal_on_read()") > > > > > > > > > > > > That patch does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree, which is why it was > > > > > > not included there. If you feel it should be included, please provide a > > > > > > backport and send it to the stable@vger.kernel.org mailing list. > > > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! I'll do the backport after this patch goes in the mainline. > > > > > > > > Why wait? > > > > > > I thought a patch must first appear in Linus's tree, before it can be > > > back-ported to the stable tree? > > > > Commit a389fcfd2cb5 _IS_ in Linus's tree, it was released in the 4.7-rc1 > > kernel, which happened in May of 2016. > > > > greg k-h > > Sorry, it looks I didn't make it clear. :-) > > v4.4.44 needs 2 patches, i.e. a389fcfd2cb5, and this patch (which is not in > Linus's tree yet). Only backporting the first patch immediately is not enough > and is also improper IMO, because the first patch introduces a new issue, > which is being resolved by this patch. So my understanding is that I should > backport the 2 patches together. Ok, that makes a bit more sense, thanks. I'll wait for your "real" patch to hit Linus's tree then. greg k-h