From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan] 5e56dfbd83: fsmark.files_per_sec -11.1% regression
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:12:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170206081236.GA3097@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170204081604.GH12121@yexl-desktop>
On Sat 04-02-17 16:16:04, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On 01/26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 25-01-17 12:27:06, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> >> On 01/24, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >> >perf profiles before and after the patch.
> >>
> >> Here is the perf profiles,
> >
> >I do not see any reclaim path in the profile... Could you take a
> >snapshot of /proc/vmstat and /proc/zoneinfo before and after the test
> >please?
>
> Sorry for the late, just come back from a vacation. Proc data is attached.
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. Could you provide this data for both with
the patch applied and without, please?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 1:26 [lkp-robot] [mm, vmscan] 5e56dfbd83: fsmark.files_per_sec -11.1% regression kernel test robot
2017-01-24 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 4:27 ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-01-26 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-04 8:16 ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-02-06 8:12 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-02-07 2:22 ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-02-07 14:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 1:27 ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-02-23 7:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-23 15:19 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170206081236.GA3097@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox