From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@virtuozzo.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: Only dump core when single-threaded
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:18:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170207231851.GA129818@beast> (raw)
The SECCOMP_RET_KILL filter return code has always killed the current
thread, not the entire process. Changing this as a side-effect of dumping
core isn't a safe thing to do (a few test suites have already flagged this
behavioral change). Instead, restore the RET_KILL semantics, but still
dump core when a RET_KILL delivers SIGSYS to a single-threaded process.
Fixes: b25e67161c29 ("seccomp: dump core when using SECCOMP_RET_KILL")
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index f8f88ebcb3ba..e15185c28de5 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -643,11 +643,14 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
default: {
siginfo_t info;
audit_seccomp(this_syscall, SIGSYS, action);
- /* Show the original registers in the dump. */
- syscall_rollback(current, task_pt_regs(current));
- /* Trigger a manual coredump since do_exit skips it. */
- seccomp_init_siginfo(&info, this_syscall, data);
- do_coredump(&info);
+ /* Dump core only if this is the last remaining thread. */
+ if (get_nr_threads(current) == 1) {
+ /* Show the original registers in the dump. */
+ syscall_rollback(current, task_pt_regs(current));
+ /* Trigger a manual coredump since do_exit skips it. */
+ seccomp_init_siginfo(&info, this_syscall, data);
+ do_coredump(&info);
+ }
do_exit(SIGSYS);
}
}
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-07 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 23:18 Kees Cook [this message]
2017-02-14 6:37 ` [PATCH] seccomp: Only dump core when single-threaded Andrei Vagin
2017-02-14 19:09 ` Kees Cook
2017-02-14 22:34 ` James Morris
2017-02-22 23:35 ` Andrei Vagin
2017-02-23 0:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170207231851.GA129818@beast \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox