Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv

Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-08T15:08:10Z

On 08/02/2017 14:33, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2017-02-08 11:04+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 07/02/2017 22:52, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> there might be some rough
>>> edges with nested, but it was broken even before, and they fix at least
>>> one known bug.
>>
>> I don't think so, nested IRQ injection is tested very well. Why do you
>> say it was broken even before?
>
> I was basing on recent bug report where we missed IOMMU injection in a
> non-nested case [1]. While we do cover the non-nested case with this
> series, I think we still miss posted interrupts from IOMMU that should
> trigger a nested VM exit from L2 to L1 -- details in review of [6/6].
>
> 1: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg144355.html

Uh, nice. Totally missed that.

Paolo