From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751430AbdBHT6Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:58:24 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:53660 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940AbdBHT6T (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:58:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:05:33 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Waiman Long Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright , Alok Kataria , Rusty Russell , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pan Xinhui , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/mutex,rwsem: Reduce vcpu_is_preempted() calling frequency Message-ID: <20170208190533.GB6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1486576825-17058-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1486576825-17058-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1486576825-17058-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:00:25PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > As the vcpu_is_preempted() call is pretty costly compared with other > checks within mutex_spin_on_owner() and rwsem_spin_on_owner(), they > are done at a reduce frequency of once every 256 iterations. That's just disgusting.