From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751438AbdBIE5f (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:57:35 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:33607 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751060AbdBIE5e (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:57:34 -0500
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:22:29 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2 1/2] fork: free vmapped stacks in
 cache when cpus are offline
Message-ID: <20170209042229.GA4311@zzz>
References: <1486613040-30555-1-git-send-email-hoeun.ryu@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1486613040-30555-1-git-send-email-hoeun.ryu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Hoeun,

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:03:46PM +0900, Hoeun Ryu wrote:
> +static int free_vm_stack_cache(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < NR_CACHED_STACKS; i++) {
> +		struct vm_struct *vm_stack = this_cpu_read(cached_stacks[i]);
> +		if (!vm_stack)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		vfree(vm_stack->addr);
> +		this_cpu_write(cached_stacks[i], NULL);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Doesn't this need to free the stacks for the 'cpu' that's passed in, instead of
"this" CPU?

- Eric