From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM / wakeirq: Fix spurious wake-up events for dedicated wakeirqs
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:25:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210222501.7948-3-tony@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210222501.7948-1-tony@atomide.com>
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Dedicated wakeirq is a one time event to wake-up the system from
low-power state and then call pm_runtime_resume() on the device wired
with the dedicated wakeirq.
Sometimes dedicated wakeirqs can get deferred if they trigger after we
call disable_irq_nosync() in dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). This can happen
if pm_runtime_get() is called around the same time a wakeirq fires.
If an interrupt fires after disable_irq_nosync(), by default it will get
tagged with IRQS_PENDING and will run later on when the interrupt is
enabled again.
Deferred wakeirqs usually just produce pointless wake-up events. But they
can also cause suspend to fail if the deferred wakeirq fires during
dpm_suspend_noirq() for example. So we really don't want to see the
deferred wakeirqs triggering after the device has resumed.
Let's fix the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the dedicated
wakeirqs. The other option would be to implement irq_disable() in the
dedicated wakeirq controller, but that's not a generic solution.
For reference below is what happens with a IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH IRQ
type wakeirq:
- resume by dedicated IRQ (EDGE_FALLING)
- suspend_enter()
....
- arch_suspend_enable_irqs()
|- dedicated IRQ armed and fired
|- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
|- disarm, disable IRQ and mark as IRQS_PENDING
....
- dpm_resume_noirq()
|- resume_device_irqs()
|- __enable_irq()
|- check_irq_resend()
|- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
|- dedicated IRQ processed
|- device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs()
|- disable_irq_wake()
....
!-> dedicated IRQ (EDGE_RISING)
-| handle_edge_irq()
|- IRQ disabled: mask_ack_irq and mark as IRQS_PENDING
....
- subsequent suspend
....
|- dpm_suspend_noirq()
|- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs()
|- __enable_irq()
|- check_irq_resend()
(a) |- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
|- pm_wakeup_event() --> abort suspend
....
|- suspend_device_irqs()
|- suspend_device_irq()
|- dedicated IRQ armed
....
(b) |- resend_irqs
|- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
|- IRQ armed -> abort suspend
because of pending IRQ System suspend can be aborted at points
(a)-not armed or (b)-armed.
Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ
handling")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
[tony@atomide.com: added a comment, updated the description]
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
wirq->irq = irq;
irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+ /* Prevent deferred spurious wakeirqs with disable_irq_nosync() */
+ irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+
/*
* Consumer device may need to power up and restore state
* so we use a threaded irq.
--
2.11.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 22:24 [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes Tony Lindgren
2017-02-10 22:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / wakeirq: Enable dedicated wakeirq for suspend Tony Lindgren
2017-02-10 22:25 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-02-10 22:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-10 22:37 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170210222501.7948-3-tony@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox