public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PM / wakeirq: Fix spurious wake-up events for dedicated wakeirqs
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:25:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210222501.7948-3-tony@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170210222501.7948-1-tony@atomide.com>

From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

Dedicated wakeirq is a one time event to wake-up the system from
low-power state and then call pm_runtime_resume() on the device wired
with the dedicated wakeirq.

Sometimes dedicated wakeirqs can get deferred if they trigger after we
call disable_irq_nosync() in dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(). This can happen
if pm_runtime_get() is called around the same time a wakeirq fires.

If an interrupt fires after disable_irq_nosync(), by default it will get
tagged with IRQS_PENDING and will run later on when the interrupt is
enabled again.

Deferred wakeirqs usually just produce pointless wake-up events. But they
can also cause suspend to fail if the deferred wakeirq fires during
dpm_suspend_noirq() for example. So we really don't want to see the
deferred wakeirqs triggering after the device has resumed.

Let's fix the issue by setting IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY flag for the dedicated
wakeirqs. The other option would be to implement irq_disable() in the
dedicated wakeirq controller, but that's not a generic solution.

For reference below is what happens with a IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH IRQ
type wakeirq:

- resume by dedicated IRQ (EDGE_FALLING)
 - suspend_enter()
  ....
 - arch_suspend_enable_irqs()
   |- dedicated IRQ armed and fired
   |- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
      |- disarm, disable IRQ and mark as IRQS_PENDING
  ....
 - dpm_resume_noirq()
   |- resume_device_irqs()
      |- __enable_irq()
         |- check_irq_resend()
            |- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
 	       |- dedicated IRQ processed
   |- device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs()
      |- disable_irq_wake()
  ....
 !-> dedicated IRQ (EDGE_RISING)
     -| handle_edge_irq()
        |- IRQ disabled: mask_ack_irq and mark as IRQS_PENDING
  ....
- subsequent suspend
  ....
  |- dpm_suspend_noirq()
     |- device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs()
        |- __enable_irq()
           |- check_irq_resend()
(a)           |- handle_threaded_wake_irq()
                 |- pm_wakeup_event() --> abort suspend
  ....
     |- suspend_device_irqs()
        |- suspend_device_irq()
           |-  dedicated IRQ armed
  ....
(b)  |- resend_irqs
        |- irq_pm_check_wakeup()
           |- IRQ armed -> abort suspend

because of pending IRQ System suspend can be aborted at points
(a)-not armed or (b)-armed.

Fixes: 4990d4fe327b ("PM / Wakeirq: Add automated device wake IRQ
handling")
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
[tony@atomide.com: added a comment, updated the description]
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
--- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
@@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
 	wirq->irq = irq;
 	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
 
+	/* Prevent deferred spurious wakeirqs with disable_irq_nosync() */
+	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
+
 	/*
 	 * Consumer device may need to power up and restore state
 	 * so we use a threaded irq.
-- 
2.11.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-10 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 22:24 [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes Tony Lindgren
2017-02-10 22:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / wakeirq: Enable dedicated wakeirq for suspend Tony Lindgren
2017-02-10 22:25 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-02-10 22:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] Two wakeirq fixes Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-10 22:37   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170210222501.7948-3-tony@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox