public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Sajjan Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device-dax: don't set kobj parent during cdev init
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 08:16:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170211071619.GA1345@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gz0C+rhR=Xzk-G58yM=qpEBEuYbkushn5dByFD38KQbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:25:35PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:41:20AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote:
> >> > I copied this code and per feedback from Greg Kroah-Hartman [1] the
> >> > cdev's kobject's parent should not be set to the related device.
> >> > This should have minor consequences but isn't doing what anyone
> >> > expects it to.
> >> >
> >> > This patch then fixes device-dax so it doesn't make the same mistake.
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/10/370
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks for following up with this fix, but this causes a
> >> use-after-free regression:
> >>
> >>  general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >>  [..]
> >>  Call Trace:
> >>   vsnprintf+0x2d7/0x500
> >>   snprintf+0x49/0x60
> >>   dev_vprintk_emit+0x68/0x230
> >>   ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20
> >>   ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
> >>   ? cmpxchg_double_slab.isra.70+0x15a/0x1c0
> >>   ? __slab_free+0x134/0x290
> >>   dev_printk_emit+0x4e/0x70
> >>   __dynamic_dev_dbg+0xc8/0x110
> >>   ? __lock_acquire+0x33d/0x1290
> >>   dax_dev_huge_fault+0xee/0x570 [dax]
> >>   __handle_mm_fault+0x5aa/0x10a0
> >>   handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x350
> >>   ? handle_mm_fault+0x3c/0x350
> >>   __do_page_fault+0x26b/0x4c0
> >>   trace_do_page_fault+0x58/0x270
> >>   do_async_page_fault+0x1a/0xa0
> >>   async_page_fault+0x28/0x30
> >>
> >> I added this reference explicitly so the parent struct device has the
> >> correct lifetime after this feedback from Al.
> >>
> >>    https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-August/006563.html
> >>
> >> ...so I'm wondering what the actual problem is with setting cdev->parent?
> >
> > It shouldn't do anything at all.  The kobject in a cdev isn't a "normal"
> > kobject, it doesn't show up in sysfs, or anywhere else.  It's used for
> > an internal representation to the cdev code (a kmap) to look up the
> > object to call when userspace opens the device node in a quick manner.
> >
> > Now changing from initialize/add to just register, does do different
> > things, perhaps that is the issue here.  Just try removing the
> > cdev->kobject parent stuff and see if that causes a problem or not.
> >
> 
>  That doesn't help.  I rely on the "kobject_get(p->kobj.parent);" in
> cdev_add() to pin my device and cdev_default_release() to free it.

"pin it" where?  Why do you need this?  That feels really "odd" to me...

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-11  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 19:19 [PATCH] device-dax: don't set kobj parent during cdev init Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-10 19:22 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-10 19:41 ` Dan Williams
2017-02-10 20:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-10 22:25     ` Dan Williams
2017-02-11  7:16       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-02-11  8:56         ` Dan Williams
2017-02-11 17:59           ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-11 18:27             ` Dan Williams
2017-02-11 18:43               ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-11 18:55                 ` Dan Williams
2017-02-11 18:58                   ` Dan Williams
2017-02-12  5:42                     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-13 20:47                       ` Dan Williams
2017-02-13 22:38                         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-02-10 19:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170211071619.GA1345@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox