public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: jiada_wang@mentor.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel is stopped
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:35:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213020530.GI2843@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486738005-4297-1-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:46:45AM -0800, jiada_wang@mentor.com wrote:
> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> 
> sdma_disable_channel() cannot ensure dma is stopped to access
> module's FIFOs. Maybe SDMA core is running and accessing BD when
> disable of corresponding channel, this may cause sometimes even
> after call of .sdma_disable_channel(), SDMA core still be running
> and accessing module's FIFOs.
> 
> We should add delay of one BD SDMA cost time, the maximum is 1ms.
> So that SDMA clients by calling .device_terminate_all can
> ensure SDMA core has really been stopped.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index d1651a5..7332c40 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -937,6 +937,14 @@ static int sdma_disable_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int sdma_disable_channel_with_delay(struct dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> +	sdma_disable_channel(chan);
> +	mdelay(1);

what is the gaurantee that 1ms is fine? Shouldn't you poll the bit to see
channel is disabled properly..

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void sdma_set_watermarklevel_for_p2p(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
>  {
>  	struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
> @@ -1828,7 +1836,7 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	sdma->dma_device.device_prep_slave_sg = sdma_prep_slave_sg;
>  	sdma->dma_device.device_prep_dma_cyclic = sdma_prep_dma_cyclic;
>  	sdma->dma_device.device_config = sdma_config;
> -	sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel;
> +	sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel_with_delay;
>  	sdma->dma_device.src_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>  	sdma->dma_device.dst_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
>  	sdma->dma_device.directions = BIT(DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) | BIT(DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-10 14:46 [PATCH 1/1] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel is stopped jiada_wang
2017-02-13  2:05 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-02-13  6:30   ` Jiada Wang
2017-02-13 10:22     ` Vinod Koul
2017-03-01  8:14       ` Jiada Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170213020530.GI2843@localhost \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox