From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
To: jiada_wang@mentor.com
Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel is stopped
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:35:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213020530.GI2843@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486738005-4297-1-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:46:45AM -0800, jiada_wang@mentor.com wrote:
> From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
>
> sdma_disable_channel() cannot ensure dma is stopped to access
> module's FIFOs. Maybe SDMA core is running and accessing BD when
> disable of corresponding channel, this may cause sometimes even
> after call of .sdma_disable_channel(), SDMA core still be running
> and accessing module's FIFOs.
>
> We should add delay of one BD SDMA cost time, the maximum is 1ms.
> So that SDMA clients by calling .device_terminate_all can
> ensure SDMA core has really been stopped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index d1651a5..7332c40 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -937,6 +937,14 @@ static int sdma_disable_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int sdma_disable_channel_with_delay(struct dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> + sdma_disable_channel(chan);
> + mdelay(1);
what is the gaurantee that 1ms is fine? Shouldn't you poll the bit to see
channel is disabled properly..
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void sdma_set_watermarklevel_for_p2p(struct sdma_channel *sdmac)
> {
> struct sdma_engine *sdma = sdmac->sdma;
> @@ -1828,7 +1836,7 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sdma->dma_device.device_prep_slave_sg = sdma_prep_slave_sg;
> sdma->dma_device.device_prep_dma_cyclic = sdma_prep_dma_cyclic;
> sdma->dma_device.device_config = sdma_config;
> - sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel;
> + sdma->dma_device.device_terminate_all = sdma_disable_channel_with_delay;
> sdma->dma_device.src_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
> sdma->dma_device.dst_addr_widths = BIT(DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
> sdma->dma_device.directions = BIT(DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) | BIT(DMA_MEM_TO_DEV);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-10 14:46 [PATCH 1/1] dma: imx-sdma: add 1ms delay to ensure SDMA channel is stopped jiada_wang
2017-02-13 2:05 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2017-02-13 6:30 ` Jiada Wang
2017-02-13 10:22 ` Vinod Koul
2017-03-01 8:14 ` Jiada Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213020530.GI2843@localhost \
--to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox