From: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCHv3] x86/selftests: add clobbers for int80 on x86_64
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:13:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170213101336.20486-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
Kernel erases R8..R11 registers prior returning to userspace
from int80: https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/1/164
GCC can reuse this registers and doesn't expect them to change
during syscall invocation. I met this kind of bug in CRIU once
gcc 6.1 and clang stored local variables in those registers
and the kernel zerofied them during syscall:
https://github.com/xemul/criu/commit/990d33f1a1cdd17bca6c2eb059ab3be2564f7fa2
By that reason I suggest to add those registers to clobbers
in selftests. Also, as notted by Andy - removed unneeded clobber
for flags in int 0x80 inline asm.
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>
---
v3: Remove not needed clobber for "flags" (Andy)
v2: Don't touch iopl test: it doesn't do int 0x80
tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c | 3 ++-
tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c | 5 ++++-
4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
index 5b2b4b3c634c..b4967d875236 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ void do_unexpected_base(void)
long ret;
asm volatile ("int $0x80"
: "=a" (ret) : "a" (243), "b" (low_desc)
- : "flags");
+ : "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
memcpy(&desc, low_desc, sizeof(desc));
munmap(low_desc, sizeof(desc));
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c
index 4af47079cf04..f6121612e769 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ldt_gdt.c
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
#define AR_DB (1 << 22)
#define AR_G (1 << 23)
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+# define INT80_CLOBBERS "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11"
+#else
+# define INT80_CLOBBERS
+#endif
+
static int nerrs;
/* Points to an array of 1024 ints, each holding its own index. */
@@ -588,7 +594,7 @@ static int invoke_set_thread_area(void)
asm volatile ("int $0x80"
: "=a" (ret), "+m" (low_user_desc) :
"a" (243), "b" (low_user_desc)
- : "flags");
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
return ret;
}
@@ -657,7 +663,7 @@ static void test_gdt_invalidation(void)
"+a" (eax)
: "m" (low_user_desc_clear),
[arg1] "r" ((unsigned int)(unsigned long)low_user_desc_clear)
- : "flags");
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
if (sel != 0) {
result = "FAIL";
@@ -688,7 +694,7 @@ static void test_gdt_invalidation(void)
"+a" (eax)
: "m" (low_user_desc_clear),
[arg1] "r" ((unsigned int)(unsigned long)low_user_desc_clear)
- : "flags");
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
if (sel != 0) {
result = "FAIL";
@@ -721,7 +727,7 @@ static void test_gdt_invalidation(void)
"+a" (eax)
: "m" (low_user_desc_clear),
[arg1] "r" ((unsigned int)(unsigned long)low_user_desc_clear)
- : "flags");
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
#ifdef __x86_64__
syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_FS, &new_base);
@@ -774,7 +780,7 @@ static void test_gdt_invalidation(void)
"+a" (eax)
: "m" (low_user_desc_clear),
[arg1] "r" ((unsigned int)(unsigned long)low_user_desc_clear)
- : "flags");
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
#ifdef __x86_64__
syscall(SYS_arch_prctl, ARCH_GET_GS, &new_base);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c
index b037ce9cf116..eaea92439708 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/ptrace_syscall.c
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static void do_full_int80(struct syscall_args32 *args)
asm volatile ("int $0x80"
: "+a" (args->nr),
"+b" (args->arg0), "+c" (args->arg1), "+d" (args->arg2),
- "+S" (args->arg3), "+D" (args->arg4), "+r" (bp));
+ "+S" (args->arg3), "+D" (args->arg4), "+r" (bp)
+ : : "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
args->arg5 = bp;
#else
sys32_helper(args, int80_and_ret);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
index 50c26358e8b7..a48da95c18fd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/single_step_syscall.c
@@ -56,9 +56,11 @@ static volatile sig_atomic_t sig_traps;
#ifdef __x86_64__
# define REG_IP REG_RIP
# define WIDTH "q"
+# define INT80_CLOBBERS "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11"
#else
# define REG_IP REG_EIP
# define WIDTH "l"
+# define INT80_CLOBBERS
#endif
static unsigned long get_eflags(void)
@@ -140,7 +142,8 @@ int main()
printf("[RUN]\tSet TF and check int80\n");
set_eflags(get_eflags() | X86_EFLAGS_TF);
- asm volatile ("int $0x80" : "=a" (tmp) : "a" (SYS_getpid));
+ asm volatile ("int $0x80" : "=a" (tmp) : "a" (SYS_getpid)
+ : INT80_CLOBBERS);
check_result();
/*
--
2.11.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-13 10:13 Dmitry Safonov [this message]
2017-02-13 19:06 ` [PATCHv3] x86/selftests: add clobbers for int80 on x86_64 Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-13 19:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-13 22:18 ` hpa
2017-02-17 17:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-01 9:47 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/selftests: Add " tip-bot for Dmitry Safonov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170213101336.20486-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
--to=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox