From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752562AbdBMTga (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:36:30 -0500
Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:35501 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751313AbdBMTg2 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:36:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:36:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>,
        "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] refcount_t: Introduce a special purpose
 refcount type
Message-ID: <20170213193623.GA28747@gmail.com>
References: <tip-f405df5de3170c00e5c54f8b7cf4766044a032ba@git.kernel.org>
 <20170213143416.GR6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAGXu5jJFa9cW-YQtDqyckfiDxJrfd1FOa3eoQAwOrvmtnOeqLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170213180020.GK6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170213180020.GK6500@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> > > And since size then isn't an issue what so ever anymore, remove the debug 
> > > knob and make all WARN()s unconditional.
> > 
> > Are you still going to land the x86 WARN_ON improvements?
> 
> Yes, once I manage to eke some response out of the relevant arch maintainers on 
> the subject ;-)

so I'm enthusiastically in support of it all! Does that count as a response? ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo