public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <michaele@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	paulus@ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/autonuma: Let architecture override how the write bit should be stashed in a protnone pte.
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:20:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214162008.bd592c747fc5e167c10ce7b8@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lzxm41g.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:59:23 +1100 Michael Ellerman <michaele@au1.ibm.com> wrote:

> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tuesday 14 February 2017 11:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Autonuma preserves the write permission across numa fault to avoid taking
> >>> a writefault after a numa fault (Commit: b191f9b106ea " mm: numa: preserve PTE
> >>> write permissions across a NUMA hinting fault"). Architecture can implement
> >>> protnone in different ways and some may choose to implement that by clearing Read/
> >>> Write/Exec bit of pte. Setting the write bit on such pte can result in wrong
> >>> behaviour. Fix this up by allowing arch to override how to save the write bit
> >>> on a protnone pte.
> >> This is pretty obviously a nop on arches that don't implement the new
> >> hooks, but it'd still be good to get an ack from someone in mm land
> >> before I merge it.
> >
> >
> > To get it apply cleanly you may need
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-autonuma-dont-use-set_pte_at-when-updating-protnone-ptes.patch
> > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-autonuma-dont-use-set_pte_at-when-updating-protnone-ptes-fix.patch
> 
> Ah OK, I missed those.
> 
> In that case these two should probably go via Andrew's tree.

Done.  But
mm-autonuma-dont-use-set_pte_at-when-updating-protnone-ptes.patch is on
hold because Aneesh saw a testing issue, so these two are also on hold.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-15  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-14  5:31 [PATCH V2 0/2] Numabalancing preserve write fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-02-14  5:31 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/autonuma: Let architecture override how the write bit should be stashed in a protnone pte Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-02-14  5:49   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-14  5:55     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-02-14 10:59       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-15  0:20         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-02-14  5:31 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] powerpc/mm/autonuma: Switch ppc64 to its own implementeation of saved write Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-02-14 11:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-14 12:26     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-02-15  0:45       ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170214162008.bd592c747fc5e167c10ce7b8@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=michaele@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox