From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751464AbdBNWhx (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:37:53 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:44770 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbdBNWhw (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:37:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:37:48 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Sakari Ailus Cc: sre@kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, mchehab@kernel.org, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC 03/13] v4l: split lane parsing code Message-ID: <20170214223748.GD11317@amd> References: <20170214133941.GA8469@amd> <20170214212927.GL16975@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170214212927.GL16975@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:39:41PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > From: Sakari Ailus > >=20 > > The function to parse CSI2 bus parameters was called > > v4l2_of_parse_csi_bus(), rename it as v4l2_of_parse_csi2_bus() in > > anticipation of CSI1/CCP2 support. > >=20 > > Obtain data bus type from bus-type property. Only try parsing bus > > specific properties in this case. > >=20 > > Separate lane parsing from CSI-2 bus parameter parsing. The CSI-1 will > > need these as well, separate them into a different > > function. have_clk_lane and num_data_lanes arguments may be NULL; the > > CSI-1 bus will have no use for them. > >=20 > > Add support for parsing of CSI-1 and CCP2 bus related properties > > documented in video-interfaces.txt. >=20 > One more thing: this conflicts badly with the V4L2 fwnode patchset. >=20 > Assuming things go well and that can be merged somewhat soonish, can I ta= ke > this and rebase it on the fwnode set? The two first patches in the set lo= ok > pretty good to me. Actually, I'd say that first four patches should be ready. Feel free to take them/rebase them/etc. I can then continue working on the rest.... Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlijhrwACgkQMOfwapXb+vJDVACfTzTUGeibgRF+HtEIYIl7MkZL fe4AoLUzo7taR/pySz+01ICR0zUgmFHt =aeHL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OaZoDhBhXzo6bW1J--