From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755628AbdBOXwx (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:52:53 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60816 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932616AbdBOXfm (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:35:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:35:41 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rob Herring Cc: Juri Lelli , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , peterz@infradead.org, Vincent Guittot , Mark Rutland , Russell King - ARM Linux , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Morten Rasmussen , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Mark Brown , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] arm, arm64: factorize common cpu capacity default code Message-ID: <20170215233541.GA7403@kroah.com> References: <20170209092525.6654-1-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20170209092525.6654-7-juri.lelli@arm.com> <20170210142857.GA18321@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:17:05PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (C) 2016, ARM Ltd. > >> + * Written by: Juri Lelli, ARM Ltd. > >> + * > >> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public > >> + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive > >> + * for more details. > > > > So, v2 only? Please be specific. Even better yet, use a SPDX header if > > you want to, those are always nice. > > Sorry to hijack this thread, but you're recommending SPDX now? You > seemed pretty negative on it last time it came up[1]. Or was that just > in context of the churn of converting existing files? It was in the context of someone trying to tell someone else to do the work for them of converting all of the existing files to use SPDX. I've never refused a patch from someone adding SPDX identifiers to the kernel, in fact, _I'm_ the only one that has ever used such an identifier on a kernel file :) > Personally, I like the use of SPDX tags over free form license text > and would like to encourage it for dts files. Sure, go ahead, I'd encourage it. thanks, greg k-h