[PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[simran singhal]

Fixed checkpatch.pl warning:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines

Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h
index 1ba4f83..5878f42 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h
@@ -1,14 +1,13 @@
 /*
-  This is part of the rtl8180-sa2400 driver
-  released under the GPL (See file COPYING for details).
-  Copyright (c) 2005 Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
-
-  This files contains programming code for the rtl8256
-  radio frontend.
-
-  *Many* thanks to Realtek Corp. for their great support!
-
-*/
+ *  This is part of the rtl8180-sa2400 driver
+ *  released under the GPL (See file COPYING for details).
+ *  Copyright (c) 2005 Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
+ *
+ *  This files contains programming code for the rtl8256
+ *  radio frontend.
+ *
+ *  Many* thanks to Realtek Corp. for their great support!
+ */
 
 #ifndef RTL8225H
 #define RTL8225H
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:27AM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> Fixed checkpatch.pl warning:
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> 
> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h | 19 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Does not apply to my tree :(

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[SIMRAN SINGHAL]

Then which tree it applies to.

Thanks,
Simran


On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:27AM +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>> Fixed checkpatch.pl warning:
>> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8190_rtl8256.h | 19 +++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Does not apply to my tree :(

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:20:22AM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> Then which tree it applies to.

I have no idea, you wrote it, not me :)

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[SIMRAN SINGHAL]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]

I am attaching the screenshot of what I am getting from the
script get_maintainer.pl.

Thanks,
Simran


On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:20:22AM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
>> Then which tree it applies to.
>
> I have no idea, you wrote it, not me :)
>
> greg k-h

[-- Attachment #2: Screenshot from 2017-02-17 00-46-27.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 107346 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:49:54AM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> I am attaching the screenshot of what I am getting from the
> script get_maintainer.pl.

I can't read images from a text email client.

I totally don't understand this conversation at all, what is the
question?  What is this concerning?  Why are you not properly quoting
things so that we can determine this?

confused,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] staging: rtl8192u: fixing block comments use * on subsequent lines

[SIMRAN SINGHAL]

Sorry for replying properly.

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:49:54AM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
>> I am attaching the screenshot of what I am getting from the
>> script get_maintainer.pl.
>
> I can't read images from a text email client.

ok, will keep this in mind.

>
> I totally don't understand this conversation at all, what is the
> question?  What is this concerning?  Why are you not properly quoting
> things so that we can determine this?

I want to say that after executing script get_maintainer.pl on the
patch, I got your
name and email id that's why I send that patch to you.

I know only one source that is get_maintainer.pl through which I find
out to whom I am
suppose to send the patch and the mailing lists I have to cc, and this
is what is mentioned
in tutorial also.

>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h