From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754056AbdBTROY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:14:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.83.43]:34982 "EHLO mail-pg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753434AbdBTROV (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:14:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:14:17 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "Eddie Kovsky" Cc: , , , "KY Srinivasan" , "Haiyang Zhang" , "Stephen Hemminger" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] module: verify address is read-only Message-ID: <20170220091417.14b21484@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <20170218055844.1457-2-ewk@edkovsky.org> References: <20170218055844.1457-1-ewk@edkovsky.org> <20170218055844.1457-2-ewk@edkovsky.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 21:58:42 -0800 "Eddie Kovsky" wrote: > Implement a mechanism to check if a module's address is in > the rodata or ro_after_init sections. It mimics the exsiting functions > that test if an address is inside a module's text section. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky I don't see the point of this for many of the hyper-v functions. They are only called from a small number of places, and this can be validated by code inspection. Adding this seems just seems to be code bloat to me.