From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751118AbdBUH6t (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:58:49 -0500
Received: from mail-wr0-f195.google.com ([209.85.128.195]:36682 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750928AbdBUH6o (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 21 Feb 2017 02:58:44 -0500
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:58:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform changes for v4.11
Message-ID: <20170221075838.GA3125@gmail.com>
References: <20170220131752.GA11678@gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFwRL_ZydndoYaqFZBnRRnt21=+kmP7tBiryfqvfis6hCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwRL_ZydndoYaqFZBnRRnt21=+kmP7tBiryfqvfis6hCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Mike Travis (2):
> >      [...]
> >
> > travis@sgi.com (8):
> >      [...]
> 
> Btw, can you be a bit more careful when applying patches to make sure
> that the name and email address is actually good?

Yes, will be more careful, sorry about that!

> This seems to be due to some screw-up on Mike's part, since the
> original email seems to have this crap in the headers:
> 
>     From: "'Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>, '@sgi.com

Yeah, that's god-awful ugly - I should have caught it at the latest when looking 
over the shortlog so there's really no excuse for missing it ...

> which should never have worked but Mike apparently screwed up some
> script, and mail transport generally has a "let any crap through"
> tendency, but I would have hoped that people who commit these things
> actually react to how bad the end result is.
> 
> Mike, please fix whatever braindamage your mail sending model has.
> 
> But Ingo and Thomas (I see both of you committing those broken
> patches), please also look at what downstream sends you, and catch it
> early rather than have crap authorship information.

Yeah.

Thanks,

	Ingo