From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vikrams@codeaurora.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: cache: Skip an unnecessary data cache clean PoU operation
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:47:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221154726.7zahvbeftxobiula@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486588777-1929-1-git-send-email-shankerd@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:19:37PM -0600, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> The cache management functions always do the data cache PoU
> (point of unification) operations even though it is not required
> on some systems. No need to clean data cache till PoU if all the
> cache levels below PoUIS are WT (Write-Through) caches. It causes
> a huge performance degradation when operating on a larger memory
> area, especially THP with 64K page size kernel.
>
> For each online CPU, check the need of 'dc cvau' instruction and
> update a global variable __dcache_flags. The two functions
> __flush_cache_user_range() and __clean_dcache_area_pou() are
> modified to skip an unnecessary code execution based on flags.
> It won't change the existing behavior if any one of the online
> CPU is capable of WB cache below PoUIS level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
[...]
> +#define CLIDR_LOUIS_SHIFT (21)
> +#define CLIDR_LOUIS_MASK (0x7)
> +#define CLIDR_LOUIS(x) (((x) >> CLIDR_LOUIS_SHIFT) & CLIDR_LOUIS_MASK)
According to the ARMv8 ARM, CLIDR_EL1 "identifies the type of cache, or
caches, that are implemented at each level and can be managed using the
architected cache maintenance instructions that operate by set/way". The
key part is "set/way" here and hence you cannot use CLIDR_EL1 and
CCSIDR_EL1 to infer whether you can skip cache maintenance by VA.
> + /* Go through all the cache level below LoUIS */
> + for (lvl = 0; lvl < louis; lvl++) {
> + csidr = cache_get_ccsidr(lvl << 1);
> + if (csidr & CCSIDR_EL1_WRITE_BACK) {
The type bits have also been deprecated in ARMv8 (we need to update the
kernel or just remove the cache topology detection entirely, leaving it
just to DT).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-21 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-08 21:19 [PATCH v2] arm64: cache: Skip an unnecessary data cache clean PoU operation Shanker Donthineni
2017-02-21 15:47 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2017-02-21 15:49 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170221154726.7zahvbeftxobiula@localhost \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox