public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"Greg KH" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Arend van Spriel" <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:02:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221180210.GL31264@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216072636.7128-1-zajec5@gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:26:35AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> So far we got only one function for loading firmware asynchronously:
> request_firmware_nowait. It didn't allow much customization of firmware
> loading process - there is only one bool uevent argument. Moreover this
> bool also controls user helper in an unclear way.
> 
> Resolve this problem by adding a one flexible function and making old
> request_firmware_nowait a simple inline using new solution. This
> implementation:
> 1) Modifies only single bits on existing code
> 2) Doesn't require adjusting / rewriting current drivers
> 3) Adds new function for drivers that need more control over loading a
>    firmware. Thanks to using flags more features can be added later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> This patch is based on top of
> [PATCH V2 RESEND] firmware: simplify defining and handling FW_OPT_FALLBACK
> applied on top of Linux 4.10-rc8.
> 
> Ming/Luis/Greg: assuming this gets a positive review, could someone of you pick
> this patchset? Second patch modifies brcmfmac, I'll try to get a proper Ack for
> that one.
> Unless you want this to go through wireless tree, then let me know please.

As I noted in the v1 post, just exposing all the flags under the hood is not
enough to ensure sanity here. Additionally just flags won't cut it to make this
as flexible as we need. I've addressed this in the driver data series, so I'll
take this feature request and fold it in there.

  Luis

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-21 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-15 22:29 [PATCH 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-15 22:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user if loading firmware file with NVRAM fails Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16  1:19   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-16  7:25     ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16  7:26 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16  7:26   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to platform one succeeds Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16  8:38     ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-16  9:04       ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16  9:18         ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-16  9:32           ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-16 10:17             ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-21  9:47   ` [PATCH V3 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-21  9:47     ` [PATCH V3 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to platform one succeeds Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-21  9:57       ` Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-21 11:46         ` Kalle Valo
2017-02-21 18:04     ` [PATCH V3 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-23 18:30     ` [PATCH V4 " Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-23 18:30       ` [PATCH V4 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to platform one succeeds Rafał Miłecki
2017-03-16  9:57       ` [PATCH V4 1/2] firmware: add more flexible request_firmware_async function Rafał Miłecki
2017-03-16 13:31         ` Greg KH
2017-03-16 13:55       ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-03-16 14:03         ` Greg KH
2017-03-17 17:29           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-27 19:28             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-02-21 18:02   ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-02-21 17:59 ` [PATCH " Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170221180210.GL31264@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox