From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754875AbdBVQI7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:08:59 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001ae601.pphosted.com ([67.231.149.25]:35004 "EHLO mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753699AbdBVQIv (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:08:51 -0500 Authentication-Results: ppops.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:09:49 +0000 From: Charles Keepax To: Rob Herring CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mfd: wm831x: Add device tree binding document Message-ID: <20170222160949.GC2742@localhost.localdomain> References: <1486984514-29749-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1486984514-29749-3-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20170222151502.njwsimmttah3tv4f@rob-hp-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170222151502.njwsimmttah3tv4f@rob-hp-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1612050000 definitions=main-1702220150 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 09:15:02AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:15:14AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: > > This is just a very simple initial binding, supporting only registering > > the chip and the GPIOs. More features will be added as support for > > device tree in the driver is expanded. > > Please make the binding as complete as you can. You don't have to have > driver side support in place. Doesn't have to be everything, but at > least everything you know you will need. > I am happy to flush the binding out with a bit more detail, although the GPIOs are actually all I need to use at the moment. I will send a new revision with some more detail. Do we normally do anything to mark the bits of the binding that are currently un-implemented? Thanks, Charles