public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:50:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222185015.GA6141@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487736674-2058-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:11:14PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Cases to bail out to avoid rendezvous process timeout:
> +	 * 1)If this CPU is offline.
> +	 * 2)If crashing_cpu was set, e.g. entering kdump,
> +	 *   we need to skip cpus remaining in 1st kernel.
> +	 */
> +	if (cpu_is_offline(cpu) ||
> +	    (crashing_cpu != -1 && crashing_cpu != cpu)) {
>  		u64 mcgstatus;
>  
>  		mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);


I think we should document the remaining race conditions. I don't
think there is any good way to eliminate them, and they are already
pretty small windows.

I think the sequence of events looks like:

     1	Panic occurs
     2	nmi_shootdown_cpus() sets crashing_cpu
     3	send NMI to everyone else
     4	wait up to a second for other CPUs to take NMI
     5	go to kexec code
     6	start new kernel
     7	new kernel establishes #MC handler

If one of the other cpus triggers a machine check while
getting to, or in, the NMI handler ... then that cpu will
skip processing (if RIPV is set).

Between '2' and '5' if crashing_cpu gets a machine check it
will execute in the old kernel handler, and do the right thing.

There's a fuzzy area between '6' and '7' where a machine check
might not end up in the right code.

>From '7' onwards the kexec kernel will handle and machine
checks caused by kdump.

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-22 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-22  4:11 [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made Xunlei Pang
2017-02-22 18:50 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-02-23  6:04   ` Xunlei Pang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170222185015.GA6141@intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox