From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 10:50:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222185015.GA6141@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487736674-2058-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:11:14PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> + /*
> + * Cases to bail out to avoid rendezvous process timeout:
> + * 1)If this CPU is offline.
> + * 2)If crashing_cpu was set, e.g. entering kdump,
> + * we need to skip cpus remaining in 1st kernel.
> + */
> + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu) ||
> + (crashing_cpu != -1 && crashing_cpu != cpu)) {
> u64 mcgstatus;
>
> mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
I think we should document the remaining race conditions. I don't
think there is any good way to eliminate them, and they are already
pretty small windows.
I think the sequence of events looks like:
1 Panic occurs
2 nmi_shootdown_cpus() sets crashing_cpu
3 send NMI to everyone else
4 wait up to a second for other CPUs to take NMI
5 go to kexec code
6 start new kernel
7 new kernel establishes #MC handler
If one of the other cpus triggers a machine check while
getting to, or in, the NMI handler ... then that cpu will
skip processing (if RIPV is set).
Between '2' and '5' if crashing_cpu gets a machine check it
will execute in the old kernel handler, and do the right thing.
There's a fuzzy area between '6' and '7' where a machine check
might not end up in the right code.
>From '7' onwards the kexec kernel will handle and machine
checks caused by kdump.
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-22 4:11 [PATCH v3] x86/mce: Don't participate in rendezvous process once nmi_shootdown_cpus() was made Xunlei Pang
2017-02-22 18:50 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-02-23 6:04 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222185015.GA6141@intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox