public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
	<rostedt@goodmis.org>, <kernel-team@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Change the way to replenish runtime for sleep tasks
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:14:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223061420.GD3817@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008a01d28d83$8d0605a0$a71210e0$@lge.com>

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:18:48PM +0900, byungchul.park wrote:
> > Current code handles this by replenishing a runtime in hrtimer callback
> > for deadline. But this approach has room for improvement in two ways:
> > 
> >    1. No need to keep the hrtimer for a sleep task because it can be
> >       handled when waking it up.
> > 
> >    2. It will be replenished twice unnecessarily if the task sleeps for
> >       long time so that the deadline, assigned in the hrtimer callback,
> >       also passed. In other words, one happens in the callback and the
> >       other happens in update_dl_entiry() when waking it up.

I wanted to enhance not only the second but also the first, so remove
the unnecessary timer overhead for sleep tasks. It's possible but it
makes code too complecated and I won't do that.

I will resend a patch doing only the second one at the next spin.

Thank you,
Byungchul

> > @@ -981,6 +983,9 @@ static void dequeue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct
> > task_struct *p, int flags)
> >  {
> >  	update_curr_dl(rq);
> >  	__dequeue_task_dl(rq, p, flags);
> > +
> > +	if (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP)
> > +		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
> 
> Sorry. I found I might have made a mistake. I might have to re-start the
> timer when waking it up if necessary. Let me think more.

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23  3:10 [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/deadline: Factor out the actual work replenishing runtime Byungchul Park
2017-02-23  3:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/deadline: Change the way to replenish runtime for sleep tasks Byungchul Park
2017-02-23  3:18   ` byungchul.park
2017-02-23  6:14     ` Byungchul Park [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170223061420.GD3817@X58A-UD3R \
    --to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox