From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751810AbdBYJTO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sat, 25 Feb 2017 04:19:14 -0500
Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:36676 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751419AbdBYJTL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 25 Feb 2017 04:19:11 -0500
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:10:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests, x86, pkeys: test with random, unallocated
 protection keys
Message-ID: <20170225091014.GA24922@gmail.com>
References: <20170223222603.A022ED65@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <20170223222604.D3AE8473@viggo.jf.intel.com>
 <806cc744-98a2-7575-30bc-a703b75a9640@kernel.org>
 <20170224074511.GB4095@gmail.com>
 <16132b4a-0a04-a4d9-f081-3ef7d51e4d78@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <16132b4a-0a04-a4d9-f081-3ef7d51e4d78@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> wrote:

> On 02/24/2017 12:45 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 02/23/2017 03:26 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>> Shuah, I assume you'll take this patch in through the selftests tree.
> >>
> >> Yes I can do that.
> > 
> > No, let's not do that please, we have a fix and a self-tests update, I'd like them 
> > to be next in the Git space.
> > 
> > I'll apply the testcase too when applying the pkeys fix, ok?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Yup. I noticed the first patch has to go through x86 tree, Sounds good
> to me. Please take both through. I am sending pull request for 4.11-rc1
> today. I have a few pkeys patches in there. Hope there won't be any
> conflicts.

Ok, I'll wait for your changes to hit upstream, to not create unnecessary 
conflicts.

Thanks,

	Ingo