From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751327AbdBZUZS (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:25:18 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40222 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbdBZUZR (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:25:17 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 10:33:41 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Waiman Long Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip 2/3] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed() Message-ID: <20170226183341.GD5126@linux-80c1.suse> References: <1487786634-22641-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1487786634-22641-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1487786634-22641-3-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Waiman Long wrote: >Move the rwsem_down_read_failed() function down to below the >optimistic spinning section as it is going to use function in that >section in a later patch. So the title is a bit ambiguous, and I would argue that this should be folded into patch 3, and just mention it in the changelog. Thanks, Davidlohr