From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751740AbdB0Stx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:49:53 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36414 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751664AbdB0Stt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 27 Feb 2017 13:49:49 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:49:48 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, jasowang@redhat.com,
        axboe@kernel.dk, pbonzini@redhat.com,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V3
Message-ID: <20170227204931-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20170205171526.6224-1-hch@lst.de>
 <20170209135031.GA5771@infradead.org>
 <20170209180130-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20170227084832.GA22373@lst.de>
 <20170227204456-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170227204456-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Mon, 27 Feb 2017 18:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:45:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:48:32AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 06:01:57PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Any chance to get this in for 4.11 after I got reviews from Jason
> > > > for most of the patches?
> > > 
> > > Absolutely, I intend to merge it.
> > 
> > So, what is the plan for virtio this merge window?  No changes seem
> > to have made it into linux-next before the merge window, never mind
> > a week into it.
> 
> Sorry I've been a bit busy. Any chance you could rebase?
> This conflicts with your patch removing vq info.

Actually it doesn't, my bad. Applied now, thanks!