From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751973AbdB1JGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 04:06:41 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001ae601.pphosted.com ([67.231.149.25]:49474 "EHLO mx0b-001ae601.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181AbdB1JGh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 04:06:37 -0500 Authentication-Results: ppops.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:01:43 +0000 From: Charles Keepax To: Tomasz Figa CC: "linus.walleij@linaro.org" , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Calculate GPIO base for pinctrl_add_gpio_range Message-ID: <20170228090143.GG2742@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170223172313.GF2742@localhost.localdomain> <1487872490-27643-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1612050000 definitions=main-1702280084 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:13:59AM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c > > index ddc8d6b..864d8b4d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c > > @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static int samsung_pinctrl_register(struct platform_device *pdev, > > pin_bank->grange.id = bank; > > pin_bank->grange.pin_base = drvdata->pin_base > > + pin_bank->pin_base; > > - pin_bank->grange.base = pin_bank->gpio_chip.base; > > + pin_bank->grange.base = pin_bank->grange.pin_base; > > If we are not reading the base from the GPIO bank anymore, maybe it > could make sense to actually make samsung_gpiolib_register() use > bank->grange.base as gc->base? This way we would avoid explicitly > numbering two times. > Yeah no problem I can respin with that included. Thanks, Charles