From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752626AbdB1NKv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:10:51 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:47571 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752564AbdB1NKY (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:10:24 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:10:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, npiggin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
Message-ID: <20170228131012.GI5680@worktop>
References: <1484745459-2055-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
 <1484745459-2055-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1484745459-2055-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
> +
> +#define idx(t)			((t)->xhlock_idx)
> +#define idx_prev(i)		((i) ? (i) - 1 : MAX_XHLOCKS_NR - 1)
> +#define idx_next(i)		(((i) + 1) % MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)

Note that:

#define idx_prev(i)		(((i) - 1) % MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)
#define idx_next(i)		(((i) + 1) % MAX_XHLOCKS_NR)

is more symmetric and easier to understand.

> +
> +/* For easy access to xhlock */
> +#define xhlock(t, i)		((t)->xhlocks + (i))
> +#define xhlock_prev(t, l)	xhlock(t, idx_prev((l) - (t)->xhlocks))
> +#define xhlock_curr(t)		xhlock(t, idx(t))

So these result in an xhlock pointer

> +#define xhlock_incr(t)		({idx(t) = idx_next(idx(t));})

This does not; which is confusing seeing how they share the same
namespace; also incr is weird.