From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751875AbdCCKmA (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 05:42:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59044 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751568AbdCCKlA (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 05:41:00 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:33:03 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Andi Kleen Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf, tools, stat: Factor out callback for collecting event values Message-ID: <20170303103303.GA8905@krava> References: <20170301064924.32172-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20170301064924.32172-2-andi@firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170301064924.32172-2-andi@firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:49:15PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: SNIP > +static void collect_data(struct perf_evsel *counter, > + void (*cb)(struct perf_evsel *counter, void *data, > + bool first), > + void *data) > +{ > + cb(counter, data, true); > +} > + > +struct aggr_data { > + u64 ena, run, val; > + int id; > + int nr; > + int cpu; > +}; > + > +static void aggr_cb(struct perf_evsel *counter, void *data, bool first) > +{ > + struct aggr_data *ad = data; > + int cpu, cpu2, s2; > + > + for (cpu = 0; cpu < perf_evsel__nr_cpus(counter); cpu++) { > + struct perf_counts_values *counts; > + > + cpu2 = perf_evsel__cpus(counter)->map[cpu]; > + s2 = aggr_get_id(evsel_list->cpus, cpu2); that does not match the removed code.. why? s2 = aggr_get_id(perf_evsel__cpus(counter), cpu); jirka