linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	keescook@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
	yinghai@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, anderson@redhat.com,
	luto@kernel.org, thgarnie@google.com, kuleshovmail@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 22:26:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170304142602.GC12083@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486040077-3719-1-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com>

Hi Ingo,

Ping!

Could you please help have a look at thie patchset and give comments or
any suggestion?

Checked the git history, you have been taking care of the
KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE value changing. Now Kees added his Reviewed-by, Boris 
agreed on setting the size of space for kernel mapping to 1G by default
but he doesn't like the adding KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE constant idea.

Your suggestion is much appreciated!

Thanks
Baoquan

On 02/02/17 at 08:54pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is v4 post.
> 
> In the previous 3 versions I tried to detect and determine kernel image
> mapping size at runtime for x86_64. With this the inconsistency between
> KASLR code is not compiled in by disabling CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and
> KASLR code is compiled in but add 'nokaslr' kernel option can be fixed.
> 
> When review v3 Boris suggested we should change kernel mapping size to
> 1G directly, but not an option. Kees explained he made kernel mapping
> size as an option mainly because he woried about kernel module space.
> He said it wasn't clear to him at the time if enough space remained for
> modules in all use-cases. Then Boris pointed out that practically kaslr
> will be enabled on the majority of the systems anyway, and the reduction
> of kernel modules mapping space has been there for a while now, if so we
> probably whould've heard complaints already. Kees agreed.
> 
> So in this version of post change kernel mapping size of x86 64 to 1G
> as Boris suggested. Then the inconsistency will naturally disappear.
> 
> And I still keep patch 1/3 which introduces the new constant
> KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE. And let KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE stay for restricting kernel
> image size during linking stage.
> 
> 
> v3->v4:
>     Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally as Boris suggested.
> 
> v2->v3:
>     Boris pointed out patch log is not good for reviewing and understanding.
>     So split the old patch 2/2 into 2 parts and rewrite the patch log,
>     patch 2/3 is introducing the new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE which
>     differs from the old KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE, patch 3/3 gets the kernel mapping
>     size at runtime.
> 
> v1->v2:
>     Kbuild test threw build warning because of code bug.
> 
> 
> Baoquan He (3):
>   x86: Introduce a new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE
>   x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally
>   x86/64/doc: Update the ranges of kernel text and modules mapping
> 
>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt         |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c        | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_32_types.h    |  6 ++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h    | 17 ++++++++---------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/head64.c                |  4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S               | 12 +++++-------
>  arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c      |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/init_64.c                   |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c                  |  6 +++---
>  10 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-04 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-02 12:54 [PATCH v4 0/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally Baoquan He
2017-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] x86: Introduce a new constant KERNEL_MAPPING_SIZE Baoquan He
2017-02-14 17:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-26  4:09     ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 11:43       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 12:06         ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 12:16           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 12:52             ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 13:11               ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 14:28                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-03 15:07                   ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 15:08                     ` Baoquan He
2017-03-03 15:23                       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-04 10:10                         ` Baoquan He
2017-03-04 11:55                           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-03-04 13:59                             ` Baoquan He
2017-03-16  8:14                         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-16  9:44                           ` Baoquan He
2017-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally Baoquan He
2017-02-02 12:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/64/doc: Update the ranges of kernel text and modules mapping Baoquan He
2017-02-02 19:40 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] x86/64/KASLR: Change kernel mapping size to 1G unconditionally Kees Cook
2017-03-04 14:26 ` Baoquan He [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170304142602.GC12083@x1 \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thgarnie@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).