From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932586AbdCFTv2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:51:28 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:60407 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754060AbdCFTvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:51:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:07:19 +0100 From: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E5vard?= Skinnemoen Cc: Linux Kernel , Nicolas Ferre , Boris Brezillon , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture Message-ID: <20170306190718.GA21771@samfundet.no> References: <20170301204426.GA694@samfundet.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Sun 05 Mar 2017 21:58:16 -0800 or thereabout, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt > wrote: >> I have prepared three patches in my for-linus branch in git tree >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/egtvedt/linux-avr32.git > > Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen > > Thank you for keeping it alive for so long! > > I looked through you tree superficially. There are a few references to > AVR32 remaining. Most of them are for other subsystems, but you could > consider picking up a couple of more for your patchset: > > include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h still defines EM_AVR32. This could be > considered a part of the architecture code. My git grep magic did not catch this. > lib/Kconfig.debug has a list of architectures which want frame > pointers. You could probably remove AVR32 from that list. Same. Will add a patch for these two. > mm/Kconfig has a special case for AVR32 needing two quicklists. > This one I have in a different series, the one I planned to push to various maintainers after the initial removal. > If you were planning to patch each of those separately later, please > ignore my comments. Partly (-: -- mvh Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt