From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932662AbdCGRoK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:44:10 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:26655 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932881AbdCGRoD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:44:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:39:35 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Arushi Singhal Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: sm750fb: fixes add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations Message-ID: <20170307173935.GL4171@mwanda> References: <20170305112450.9066-1-arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> <20170305112450.9066-2-arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170305112450.9066-2-arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 04:54:48PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote: > This patch fixes the warnings reported by checkpatch.pl > for please use a blank line after function/struct/union/enum > declarations. > > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal > --- > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h | 1 + > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.h | 2 ++ > drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h | 1 + > drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_cursor.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h > index e2a3f84ca4c5..8bf22e4f0d8b 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.h > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ typedef enum _disp_output_t { > do_CRT_PRI = CRT_2_PRI | PRI_TP_ON | DPMS_ON | DAC_ON, > do_CRT_SEC = CRT_2_SEC | SEC_TP_ON | DPMS_ON | DAC_ON, > } > + > disp_output_t; Nah... This is a typedef and this change makes it even worse. It should be on the same line as the }. } disp_output_t; But actually this typedef is not allowed. regards, dan carpenter