From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/wait: Introduce new, more compact wait_event*() primitives
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:55:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170308115505.GA17536@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170308083719.GA3251@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> You can find the latest (WIP, frequently rebased) version in:
>
> git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.sched/core
>
> The first 10 patches reshape the waitqueue code to be more hackable (to me!),
> because I kept bumping into confusing names all the time, but the real change
> you'd be most interested in is, in an RFC (to be rebased!) form, the following
> one:
>
> 0c32c5717beb sched/wait: Introduce new, more compact wait_event*() primitives
>
> I've attached that patch below as well.
Note that I rebased it meanwhile so the SHA1's changed. The commit titles should
still be the same though.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-08 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 1:36 [GIT PULL] sched.h split-up Ingo Molnar
2017-03-03 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-04 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-07 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 0:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-08 8:37 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/wait: Introduce new, more compact wait_event*() primitives Ingo Molnar
2017-03-08 9:17 ` [RFC PATCH] sched/wait: Add <linux/sched/signal.h> dependency for now Ingo Molnar
2017-03-08 10:11 ` [PATCH -v2] " Ingo Molnar
2017-03-08 11:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-03-08 12:10 ` [RFC PATCH, -v2] sched/wait: Introduce new, more compact wait_event*() primitives Ingo Molnar
2017-03-09 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-08 16:37 ` [RFC PATCH] " Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170308115505.GA17536@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).