From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932276AbdCIMP4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:15:56 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48320 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753158AbdCIMPz (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:15:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:08:50 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pushkar Jambhlekar Cc: Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , James Simmons , "John L. Hammond" , Jinshan Xiong , Fan Yong , lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor Fix to please checkpatch Declaring 'unsigned int' instead of 'unsigned' Message-ID: <20170309120850.GA13054@kroah.com> References: <1489060251-22958-1-git-send-email-pushkar.iit@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1489060251-22958-1-git-send-email-pushkar.iit@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:20:51PM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_dev.c | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot