From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754251AbdCIMsX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:48:23 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49690 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753163AbdCIMsW (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:48:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:48:06 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= <arve@android.com>,
        Riley Andrews <riandrews@android.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@google.com>, Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
        peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@sonymobile.com>,
        Rom Lemarchand <romlem@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging, android: remove lowmemory killer from the tree
Message-ID: <20170309124806.GA8569@kroah.com>
References: <20170222120121.12601-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
 <20170309091513.GA11598@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20170309093028.GA12156@kroah.com>
 <20170309100006.GF11592@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170309100006.GF11592@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 11:00:07AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 09-03-17 10:30:28, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Greg, do you see any obstacle to have this merged. The discussion so far
> > > shown that a) vendors are not using the code as is b) there seems to be
> > > an agreement that something else than we have in the kernel is really
> > > needed.
> > 
> > Well, some vendors are using the code as-is, just not Sony...
> > 
> > I think the ideas that Tim wrote about is the best way forward for this.
> > I'd prefer to leave the code in the kernel until that solution is
> > integrated, as dropping support entirely isn't very nice.
> > 
> > But, given that almost no Android system is running mainline at the
> > moment, I will queue this patch up for 4.12-rc1, which will give the
> > Google people a bit more of an incentive to get their solution
> > implemented and working and merged :)
> > 
> > Sound reasonable?
> 
> sounds good to me.

Oh nevermind, might as well commit it now to my -next branch.  All now
deleted :)

greg k-h