From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clock: Fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible bug
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:31:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309153114.GU30506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170309152420.GC3343@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:24:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:53:06PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The v4.11-rc1 kernel emits the following splat in some configurations:
> >
> > [ 43.681891] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/3:1/49
> > [ 43.682511] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
> > [ 43.682893] CPU: 0 PID: 49 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc1+ #1
> > [ 43.683382] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> > [ 43.683497] Workqueue: events __clear_sched_clock_stable
> > [ 43.683497] Call Trace:
> > [ 43.683497] dump_stack+0x4f/0x69
> > [ 43.683497] check_preemption_disabled+0xd9/0xf0
> > [ 43.683497] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
> > [ 43.683497] __clear_sched_clock_stable+0x11/0x60
> > [ 43.683497] process_one_work+0x146/0x430
> > [ 43.683497] worker_thread+0x126/0x490
> > [ 43.683497] kthread+0xfc/0x130
> > [ 43.683497] ? process_one_work+0x430/0x430
> > [ 43.683497] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
> > [ 43.683497] ? umh_complete+0x30/0x30
> > [ 43.683497] ? call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x12a/0x130
> > [ 43.683497] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40
> > [ 43.689244] sched_clock: Marking unstable (43688244724, 179505618)<-(43867750342, 0)
> >
> > This happens because workqueue handlers run with preemption enabled
> > by default and the new this_scd() function accesses per-CPU variables.
> > This commit therefore disables preemption across this call to this_scd()
> > and to the uses of the pointer that it returns. Lightly tested
> > successfully on x86.
>
> Does this also work?
Thank you! I will give it a shot after the other tests complete.
> ---
> kernel/sched/clock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> index a08795e21628..c63042253b65 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void clear_sched_clock_stable(void)
> smp_mb(); /* matches sched_clock_init_late() */
>
> if (sched_clock_running == 2)
> - schedule_work(&sched_clock_work);
> + schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &sched_clock_work);
> }
>
> void sched_clock_init_late(void)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-09 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 21:53 [PATCH] clock: Fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible bug Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-09 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-09 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-03-09 18:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-10 17:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-13 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-13 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-14 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-15 22:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-16 15:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 16:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-16 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-16 21:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-23 9:10 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/clock: Fix clear_sched_clock_stable() preempt wobbly tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-23 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170309153114.GU30506@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox