public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86/nmi: Optimize address compares with better jump algorithm
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:42:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309224204.066497548@goodmis.org> (raw)


I started working on the x86-32 fentry code and I noticed that I had some
old patches in my local tip/x86/core branch. Looking at them, they still
seem relevant.

They are from 2014 when I was working at Red Hat. I kept the author having
(Red Hat) and since I forward ported them now that I work for VMware,
I used (VMware) in my Signed-off-by.

Both these patches are basically doing the same thing but to different
parts. One is making a better test of the RIP the other is a better
test of the RSP. Each patch describe what they are doing.

Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (2):
      x86/nmi: Optimize the check for being in the repeat_nmi code
      x86/nmi: Fix and optimize the NMI stack check code

----
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-09 22:42 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/nmi: Optimize the check for being in the repeat_nmi code Steven Rostedt
2017-03-10  2:42   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10  3:49     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-10  3:50       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-10  7:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-10 19:00           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-10 19:03             ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/nmi: Fix and optimize the NMI stack check code Steven Rostedt
2017-03-10  2:43   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309224204.066497548@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox