[PATCH 4.9 118/153] gfs2: Add missing rcu locking for glock lookup

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-03-10T09:23:51Z

From: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>

commit f38e5fb95a1f8feda88531eedc98f69b24748712 upstream.

We must hold the rcu read lock across looking up glocks and trying to
bump their refcount to prevent the glocks from being freed in between.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -658,9 +658,11 @@ int gfs2_glock_get(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp,
struct kmem_cache *cachep;
int ret, tries = 0;

+ rcu_read_lock();
gl = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&gl_hash_table, &name, ht_parms);
if (gl && !lockref_get_not_dead(&gl->gl_lockref))
gl = NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();

*glp = gl;
if (gl)
@@ -728,15 +730,18 @@ again:

if (ret == -EEXIST) {
ret = 0;
+ rcu_read_lock();
tmp = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&gl_hash_table, &name, ht_parms);
if (tmp == NULL || !lockref_get_not_dead(&tmp->gl_lockref)) {
if (++tries < 100) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
cond_resched();
goto again;
}
tmp = NULL;
ret = -ENOMEM;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
}