public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Compiling kernels faster (was Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null))
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:17:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310131750.GB11875@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUmHEjrLoB=S+wto6Z4mP7-DxkO83FWn37soQ6sXSSGDQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2193 bytes --]

On Thu 2017-03-09 13:16:09, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > On Thu 2017-03-09 10:38:46, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >> > Well, I have fast CPUs, but most of the time they just compile
> >> > stuff. Especially bisect is compile-heavy. I suspect going back to
> >> > gcc-3.2 would bring me bigger advantages than CPU upgrade...
> >>
> >> I hope you do use ccache or distcc?
> >
> > I tried to use distcc before, but it was rather hard to maintain. No
> > ccache here. Hmm. I guess ccache really makes sense for bisect.
> 
> Yes it does. So if you're not using it yet, do the below, today, not tomorrow.
> 
> If your distro supports it, prepend /usr/lib/ccache/ to your $PATH.
> Create symlinks from the names of your favorite cross-compilers
> to /usr/bin/ccache, and make sure they are early in your $PATH.
> 
> That's it! Enjoy!

Hmm. Installed, and seems to work. OTOH, compilation now seems to
produce 2-3MB/sec writing on spinning rust, and CPUs are no longer
fully loaded. (make -j 7 on 2 core HT machine). Any io load sends the
CPU utilization to cca 50% range... Compilation goes up from 9:13 to
11:40... to 23 minutes depending on situation. I guess it is still
worth it for the bisect, but it looks like ccache really needs an ssd.

On the other hand, switching to -O1 is really easy, and gets 15% or so
improvement.

Hmm. And killing chromium matters a lot for a compile time. I hate
modern web :-(.

Best regards,							Pavel


--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -639,9 +639,9 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
 KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -Os $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
 ifdef CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES
-KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O2 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS  += -O1 $(call cc-disable-warning,maybe-uninitialized,)
 else
-KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O2
+KBUILD_CFLAGS   += -O1
 endif
 endif

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 22:14 v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Pavel Machek
2017-02-21 23:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-21 23:15   ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 16:45     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 20:51       ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-02-22 21:15         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 21:05   ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 21:21     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 22:47       ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-22 22:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-22 23:18           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-02-23 20:10             ` Pavel Machek
2017-02-25  5:04               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:45                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-06 16:38                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-07 17:38                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 17:52                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-07 17:59                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-07 18:28                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:30                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 18:40                             ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 17:37                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-08 18:25                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-08 18:54                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-08 21:22                                   ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09  9:38                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-09 10:56                                       ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 12:16                                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 13:17                                           ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2017-03-10 13:28                                             ` Compiling kernels faster (was Re: v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null)) Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-10 14:15                                             ` Willy Tarreau
2017-03-09 10:49                                     ` Old compiler versions " Pavel Machek
2017-03-09 18:05                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-09 15:29                                     ` v4.10: kernel stack frame pointer .. has bad value (null) Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-09 21:12                                       ` Pavel Machek
2017-03-08 21:29                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-09 14:14                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-09 18:31                                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 15:42                                     ` [PATCH] x86: mostly disable '-maccumulate-outgoing-args' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 17:32                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 18:36                                         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 18:53                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:04                                             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-16 19:07                                               ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:06                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-16 19:31                                       ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-22  7:51                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-22 15:48                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28  8:13                                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/build: Mostly " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-28 16:17                                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-30  9:58                                         ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170310131750.GB11875@amd \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox