From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934295AbdCJWFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:05:54 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39698 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932789AbdCJWFq (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:05:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 23:05:33 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Arushi Singhal Cc: outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues Message-ID: <20170310220533.GA19329@kroah.com> References: <20170310215657.7069-1-arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170310215657.7069-1-arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 03:26:54AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote: > Improve readability by fixing multiple checkpatch.pl > issues in sm750fb driver. Note, _PLEASE_ put the subsystem/driver name in this 0/X email subject line, like your patches have them. It makes it easier when I sort patches by driver/subsystem when reviewing them. As it is, I end up always ignoring these 0/X emails. thanks, greg k-h