public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, C.Emde@osadl.org,
	paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:37:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170313143756.GA3373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489399728-60265-1-git-send-email-qi.hou@windriver.com>


Thanks for Cc'ing me.

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Qi Hou wrote:
> The current order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() would provoke an
> "unannotated irqs-off" WARNING.
> 
> This warning was reported by check_flags() when it found that the hardirqs has
> been disabled but the irq-flags state, hardirqs_enabled, has not been cleared.
> 
> Check_flags() is called via trace_hardirqs_off(), and trace_hardirqs_off() will
> be called by functions kind of local_irq_disable() if CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS has
> been enabled.
> 
> The calltrace from functions kind of local_irq_diasble() to check_flags()
> simplied as below:
> 
> local_irq_disable()
>  |- trace_hardirqs_off()
>      |- trace_hardirqs_off_caller()
>          |- preemptirqsoff_hist()
>             |- __DO_TRACE()
>                |- rcu_dereference_sched()
>                    |- rcu_read_lock_sched_held()
>                        |- lock_is_held()
>                            |- check_flags()
> 
> The order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() can be simplified as below:
> 
> local_irq_disable()
>  |- raw_local_irq_disable()
>  |- trace_hardirqs_off()
>      |- trace_hardirqs_off() --> check_flags()
>      |- hardirqs_enabled = 0
> 
> We could find that the call to check_flags() has been made between disabling
> hardirqs and clearing hardirqs_enabled. That will definitely cause an
> "unannotated irqs-off" warning.
> 
> To fix this "unannotated irqs-off" warning, we must call trace_hardirqs_off()
> after that we clear hardirqs_enabled.

Here you say: "trace_hardirqs_off()"

> Signed-off-by: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>
> ---
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 577f026..e8b35e4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2627,8 +2627,6 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long ip)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *curr = current;
>  
> -	time_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0, ip);

This is: "TIME_hardirqs_off()", notice the difference?

Care to try to write a changelog that makes sense?

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-13 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-13 10:08 [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled Qi Hou
2017-03-13 14:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-14  1:24   ` qhou
2017-03-13 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170313143756.GA3373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=qi.hou@windriver.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox