From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, C.Emde@osadl.org,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:37:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170313143756.GA3373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489399728-60265-1-git-send-email-qi.hou@windriver.com>
Thanks for Cc'ing me.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Qi Hou wrote:
> The current order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() would provoke an
> "unannotated irqs-off" WARNING.
>
> This warning was reported by check_flags() when it found that the hardirqs has
> been disabled but the irq-flags state, hardirqs_enabled, has not been cleared.
>
> Check_flags() is called via trace_hardirqs_off(), and trace_hardirqs_off() will
> be called by functions kind of local_irq_disable() if CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS has
> been enabled.
>
> The calltrace from functions kind of local_irq_diasble() to check_flags()
> simplied as below:
>
> local_irq_disable()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off_caller()
> |- preemptirqsoff_hist()
> |- __DO_TRACE()
> |- rcu_dereference_sched()
> |- rcu_read_lock_sched_held()
> |- lock_is_held()
> |- check_flags()
>
> The order of calls within trace_hardirqs_off() can be simplified as below:
>
> local_irq_disable()
> |- raw_local_irq_disable()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off()
> |- trace_hardirqs_off() --> check_flags()
> |- hardirqs_enabled = 0
>
> We could find that the call to check_flags() has been made between disabling
> hardirqs and clearing hardirqs_enabled. That will definitely cause an
> "unannotated irqs-off" warning.
>
> To fix this "unannotated irqs-off" warning, we must call trace_hardirqs_off()
> after that we clear hardirqs_enabled.
Here you say: "trace_hardirqs_off()"
> Signed-off-by: Qi Hou <qi.hou@windriver.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 577f026..e8b35e4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2627,8 +2627,6 @@ __visible void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long ip)
> {
> struct task_struct *curr = current;
>
> - time_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0, ip);
This is: "TIME_hardirqs_off()", notice the difference?
Care to try to write a changelog that makes sense?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-13 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-13 10:08 [PATCH] lockdep: call trace_hardirqs_off after clearing hardirqs_enabled Qi Hou
2017-03-13 14:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-03-14 1:24 ` qhou
2017-03-13 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170313143756.GA3373@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=qi.hou@windriver.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox