From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750925AbdCNFrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:47:24 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34830 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724AbdCNFrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 01:47:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:47:07 +0800 From: Greg KH To: mshan Cc: domdevlin@free.fr, bhumirks@gmail.com, chopin.simon@gmail.com, mohsinshan1k@gmail.com, peter@hurleysoftware.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixed a minor coding style warning. Arguments in the macros should be coverd in brackets to aviod any precedence issues. Message-ID: <20170314054707.GA22688@kroah.com> References: <1489467134-6455-1-git-send-email-mohsinshan1k@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1489467134-6455-1-git-send-email-mohsinshan1k@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:52:14PM -0700, mshan wrote: > Signed-off-by: mshan > --- > drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or possibly, any description at all, in the email body. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to properly describe the change. - You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg, and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should look like. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot